↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations towards an integrated, life-course approach to women’s health in the post-2015 agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommendations towards an integrated, life-course approach to women’s health in the post-2015 agenda
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, September 2013
DOI 10.2471/blt.13.117622
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo S Azenha, Cristina Parsons-Perez, Sarah Goltz, Afsan Bhadelia, Alessandra Durstine, Felicia Knaul, Julie Torode, Ann Starrs, Helen McGuire, Jennifer Drake Kidwell, Ariella Rojhani, Ricky Lu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Rwanda 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 66 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 19%
Psychology 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,672,315
of 15,856,856 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1,534
of 3,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,921
of 255,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,856,856 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.