↓ Skip to main content

What difference does ("good") HRM make?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What difference does ("good") HRM make?
Published in
Human Resources for Health, June 2004
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-2-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Buchan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 155 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Postgraduate 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 41 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#855
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,831
of 62,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.