↓ Skip to main content

Mast cell activation disease: a concise practical guide for diagnostic workup and therapeutic options

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,304)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
78 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
49 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mast cell activation disease: a concise practical guide for diagnostic workup and therapeutic options
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1756-8722-4-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerhard J Molderings, Stefan Brettner, Jürgen Homann, Lawrence B Afrin

Abstract

Mast cell activation disease comprises disorders characterized by accumulation of genetically altered mast cells and/or abnormal release of these cells' mediators, affecting functions in potentially every organ system, often without causing abnormalities in routine laboratory or radiologic testing. In most cases of mast cell activation disease, diagnosis is possible by relatively non-invasive investigation. Effective therapy often consists simply of antihistamines and mast cell membrane-stabilising compounds supplemented with medications targeted at specific symptoms and complications. Mast cell activation disease is now appreciated to likely be considerably prevalent and thus should be considered routinely in the differential diagnosis of patients with chronic multisystem polymorbidity or patients in whom a definitively diagnosed major illness does not well account for the entirety of the patient's presentation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 207 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Other 31 14%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 37 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#421,597
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#25
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,329
of 120,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hematology & Oncology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them