You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and causes of congenital microcephaly in the absence of a Zika virus outbreak in southern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pediatria, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jped.2018.05.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvani Herber, André A Silva, Maria Teresa V Sanseverino, Luciana Friedrich, Tani M S Ranieri, Catia Favreto, Lucas R Fraga, Anna P Terra, Ida V D Schwartz, Lavínia Schuler-Faccini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#176
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,753
of 341,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.