| Title |
Food systems for sustainable development: proposals for a profound four-part transformation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13593-018-0519-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Caron, Gabriel Ferrero y de Loma-Osorio, David Nabarro, Etienne Hainzelin, Marion Guillou, Inger Andersen, Tom Arnold, Margarita Astralaga, Marcel Beukeboom, Sam Bickersteth, Martin Bwalya, Paula Caballero, Bruce M. Campbell, Ntiokam Divine, Shenggen Fan, Martin Frick, Anette Friis, Martin Gallagher, Jean-Pierre Halkin, Craig Hanson, Florence Lasbennes, Teresa Ribera, Johan Rockstrom, Marlen Schuepbach, Andrew Steer, Ann Tutwiler, Gerda Verburg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 22 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 7% |
| United States | 11 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 8 | 4% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Sweden | 6 | 3% |
| Ireland | 5 | 3% |
| Finland | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 64 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 144 | 80% |
| Scientists | 22 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 621 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 621 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 91 | 15% |
| Researcher | 87 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 102 | 16% |
| Unknown | 205 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 71 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 28 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 107 | 17% |
| Unknown | 233 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#204,233
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#7
of 774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,250
of 337,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.