↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the agreements and controversies surrounding childhood psychopharmacology

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the agreements and controversies surrounding childhood psychopharmacology
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-2-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Parens, Josephine Johnston

Abstract

The number of children in the US taking prescription drugs for emotional and behavioral disturbances is growing dramatically. This growth in the use of psychotropic drugs in pediatric populations has given rise to multiple controversies, ranging from concerns over off-label use and long-term safety to debates about the societal value and cultural meaning of pharmacological treatment of childhood behavioral and emotional disorders. This commentary summarizes the authors' eight main findings from the first of five workshops that seek to understand and produce descriptions of these controversies. The workshop series is convened by The Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute located in Garrison, New York, U.S.A.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Canada 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 46 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Psychology 13 23%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Philosophy 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#477
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,877
of 155,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.