↓ Skip to main content

Chinese herbal medicines in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese herbal medicines in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006224.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dengfeng, W, Taixiang, W, Lina, Hu, Marjoribanks, J, Guanjian, Lgj, Haijun, J, Ying, S, Jing, Zhang, Dengfeng, Wang, Marjoribanks, Jane, Haijun, Jia, Ying, Sun, Zhang, Jing, Liu, Guan J, Wu, Taixiang

Abstract

Traditional Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been used widely in Chinese hospitals to treat ectopic pregnancy. Many studies have been published supporting its use but the evidence has not been systematically reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 23%
Researcher 7 18%
Other 6 15%
Librarian 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Unspecified 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,762
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,698
of 75,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.