You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Urinary sodium excretion, blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: a community-level prospective epidemiological cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31376-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Mente, Martin O'Donnell, Sumathy Rangarajan, Matthew McQueen, Gilles Dagenais, Andreas Wielgosz, Scott Lear, Shelly Tse Lap Ah, Li Wei, Rafael Diaz, Alvaro Avezum, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Fernando Lanas, Prem Mony, Andrzej Szuba, Romaina Iqbal, Rita Yusuf, Noushin Mohammadifard, Rasha Khatib, Khalid Yusoff, Noorhassim Ismail, Sadi Gulec, Annika Rosengren, Afzalhussein Yusufali, Lanthe Kruger, Lungiswa Primrose Tsolekile, Jephat Chifamba, Antonio Dans, Khalid F Alhabib, Karen Yeates, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 717 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 101 | 14% |
| Spain | 61 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 5% |
| Canada | 35 | 5% |
| Mexico | 24 | 3% |
| Australia | 20 | 3% |
| India | 15 | 2% |
| Colombia | 11 | 2% |
| Japan | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 135 | 19% |
| Unknown | 268 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 492 | 69% |
| Scientists | 106 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 99 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 424 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 93 | 22% |
| Unknown | 114 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 141 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,001
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#285
of 42,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141
of 342,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.