↓ Skip to main content

「尊厳」は役に立たないか:多元的社会のための「尊厳」概念

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「尊厳」は役に立たないか:多元的社会のための「尊厳」概念
Published in
Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.24504/itetsu.34.0_32
Authors

石田 安実

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,803,197
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine
#4
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,566
of 339,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them