↓ Skip to main content

ISEC2014: hSDM, an R package for hierarchical species distribution models taking into account imperfect detection and spatial correlation of the observations

Overview of attention for research output published on figshare, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
ISEC2014: hSDM, an R package for hierarchical species distribution models taking into account imperfect detection and spatial correlation of the observations
Published on
figshare, October 2015
DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.1577538
Authors

Ghislain Vieilledent, Cory Merow, Jérôme Guélat, Andrew M. Latimer, Marc Kéry, Alan E. Gelfand, Adam Wilson, Frédéric Mortier, John A. Silander Jr., Ghislain, Vieilledent, Cory, Merow, Jérôme, Guélat, Andrew, M. Latimer, Marc, Kéry, Alan E., Gelfand, Adam, Wilson, Frédéric, Mortier, John, A. Silander Jr.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,402,610
of 6,258,277 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#3,861
of 8,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,663
of 195,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#250
of 572 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,258,277 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 572 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.