You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ISEC2014: hSDM, an R package for hierarchical species distribution models taking into account imperfect detection and spatial correlation of the observations
|
|---|---|
| Published on |
figshare, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.6084/m9.figshare.1577538 |
| Authors |
Ghislain Vieilledent, Cory Merow, Jérôme Guélat, Andrew M. Latimer, Marc Kéry, Alan E. Gelfand, Adam Wilson, Frédéric Mortier, John A. Silander Jr., Ghislain, Vieilledent, Cory, Merow, Jérôme, Guélat, Andrew, M. Latimer, Marc, Kéry, Alan E., Gelfand, Adam, Wilson, Frédéric, Mortier, John, A. Silander Jr. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,755,735
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#10,784
of 23,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,151
of 280,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#252
of 572 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,709 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 572 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.