You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
A Review of the Possible Perceptual and Physiological Effects of Wind Turbine Noise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Hearing, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2331216518789551 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Carlile, John L. Davy, David Hillman, Kym Burgemeister |
| Abstract |
This review considers the nature of the sound generated by wind turbines focusing on the low-frequency sound (LF) and infrasound (IS) to understand the usefulness of the sound measures where people work and sleep. A second focus concerns the evidence for mechanisms of physiological transduction of LF/IS or the evidence for somatic effects of LF/IS. While the current evidence does not conclusively demonstrate transduction, it does present a strong prima facia case. There are substantial outstanding questions relating to the measurement and propagation of LF and IS and its encoding by the central nervous system relevant to possible perceptual and physiological effects. A range of possible research areas are identified. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 17% |
| Energy | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |