↓ Skip to main content

Immunological hallmarks of stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Immunology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
patent
2 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
703 Mendeley
Title
Immunological hallmarks of stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment
Published in
Nature Reviews Immunology, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nri3902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon J. Turley, Viviana Cremasco, Jillian L. Astarita

Abstract

A dynamic and mutualistic interaction between tumour cells and the surrounding stroma promotes the initiation, progression, metastasis and chemoresistance of solid tumours. Far less understood is the relationship between the stroma and tumour-infiltrating leukocytes; however, emerging evidence suggests that the stromal compartment can shape antitumour immunity and responsiveness to immunotherapy. Thus, there is growing interest in elucidating the immunomodulatory roles of the stroma that evolve within the tumour microenvironment. In this Review, we discuss the evidence that stromal determinants interact with leukocytes and influence antitumour immunity, with emphasis on the immunological attributes of stromal cells that may foster their protumorigenic function.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 703 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 687 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 201 29%
Researcher 148 21%
Student > Master 76 11%
Student > Bachelor 61 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 6%
Other 105 15%
Unknown 67 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 151 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 123 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 89 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 3%
Other 63 9%
Unknown 97 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,032,727
of 15,432,190 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#406
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,334
of 286,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,432,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.