↓ Skip to main content

Diversification of land plants: insights from a family-level phylogenetic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversification of land plants: insights from a family-level phylogenetic analysis
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Fiz-Palacios, Harald Schneider, Jochen Heinrichs, Vincent Savolainen

Abstract

Some of the evolutionary history of land plants has been documented based on the fossil record and a few broad-scale phylogenetic analyses, especially focusing on angiosperms and ferns. Here, we reconstructed phylogenetic relationships among all 706 families of land plants using molecular data. We dated the phylogeny using multiple fossils and a molecular clock technique. Applying various tests of diversification that take into account topology, branch length, numbers of extant species as well as extinction, we evaluated diversification rates through time. We also compared these diversification profiles against the distribution of the climate modes of the Phanerozoic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 190 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 9%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor 17 8%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 63%
Environmental Science 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 23 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,578
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,504
of 245,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#27
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.