↓ Skip to main content

Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 6,500)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3742 Mendeley
citeulike
44 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
Published in
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, January 1999
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Kruger, David Dunning

Abstract

People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,513 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,742 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 159 4%
United Kingdom 73 2%
Germany 42 1%
Canada 23 <1%
Brazil 21 <1%
Sweden 19 <1%
Spain 17 <1%
Australia 16 <1%
South Africa 15 <1%
Other 121 3%
Unknown 3236 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 768 21%
Researcher 552 15%
Student > Master 542 14%
Student > Bachelor 308 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 275 7%
Other 1108 30%
Unknown 189 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 743 20%
Social Sciences 486 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 380 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 296 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 295 8%
Other 1240 33%
Unknown 302 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1505. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,763
of 14,153,329 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
#1
of 6,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 206,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personality & Social Psychology
#1
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,153,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.