You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Assessment, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1073191118793208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Paul H. P. Hanel, Lukas J. Wolf |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 250 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 83 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,556,681
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from Assessment
#35
of 882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,879
of 334,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Assessment
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.