↓ Skip to main content

Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-11-95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ipek Gurol-Urganci, David A Cromwell, Leroy C Edozien, Gordon CS Smith, Chidimma Onwere, Tahir A Mahmood, Allan Templeton, Jan H van der Meulen

Abstract

Objective: To compare the risk of placenta previa at second birth among women who had a cesarean section (CS) at first birth with women who delivered vaginally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 167 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 35 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 49 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,905,574
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,381
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,976
of 243,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.