↓ Skip to main content

Chinese medicinal herbs for measles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for measles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005531.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shou Chen, Taixiang Wu, Xiangyu Kong, Hao Yuan

Abstract

Measles is an infectious disease caused by the Morbillivirus. Chinese physicians believe that medicinal herbs are effective in alleviating symptoms and preventing complications. Chinese herbal medicines are dispensed according to the particular symptoms. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 69%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 62%
Student > Postgraduate 5 38%
Unspecified 4 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Other 12 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 162%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 31%
Unspecified 4 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 15%
Other 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,554,508
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,526
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,686
of 211,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#365
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.