↓ Skip to main content

Cutaneous epithelioid angiomatous nodule: a report of a series including a case with moderate cytologic atypia and immunosuppression

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cutaneous epithelioid angiomatous nodule: a report of a series including a case with moderate cytologic atypia and immunosuppression
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13000-018-0729-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Runjan Chetty, Zaid S. Kamil, Ami Wang, Ayman Al Habeeb, Danny Ghazarian

Abstract

Cutaneous epithelioid angiomatous nodule (CEAN) is a very rare and relatively recently recognized vascular proliferation characterized usually by minimal cytological atypia and accompanying mitotic activity. As such, CEAN represents an important diagnostic pitfall, which could lead to significant misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment. The clinicopathologic findings of 5 cases of CEAN were reviewed including a unique case with typical findings but also moderate cytologic atypia and brisk mitotic activity in a patient on immunosuppression. The cases were in 3 women and 2 men ranging in age from 18 to 61 years with lesions in the neck (2 cases), upper arm, back and shoulder. In 4 of the cases, the patients did not have any relevant potentially contributory clinical history, and in 1 case the patient was on immunosuppressive treatment. All 5 cases were superficially located within the dermis, well-circumscribed and similarly composed of epithelioid cells displaying minimal (in 4 cases) and moderate (1 case) atypia. The mitotic count ranged from 1 to 3 per 10 high power fields (HPF) in 4 cases and up to 9 per 10 HPF in the immunosuppressed patient. Atypical mitoses were not encountered in any of the cases. Two lesions that were incompletely excised recurred, but none of the patients showed distant metastases. While cytologically alarming, CEAN has a characteristic microscopic appearance and if completely excised follows an indolent course.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,312,298
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#318
of 1,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,045
of 341,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.