You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pangenome Analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei: Genome Evolution Preserves Gene Order despite High Recombination Rates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0140274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Senanu M. Spring-Pearson, Joshua K. Stone, Adina Doyle, Christopher J. Allender, Richard T. Okinaka, Mark Mayo, Stacey M. Broomall, Jessica M. Hill, Mark A. Karavis, Kyle S. Hubbard, Joseph M. Insalaco, Lauren A. McNew, C. Nicole Rosenzweig, Henry S. Gibbons, Bart J. Currie, David M. Wagner, Paul Keim, Apichai Tuanyok |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 24% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,181
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,921
of 297,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,077
of 5,551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.