↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of Self-Rated Health with Fatal and Non-Fatal Outcomes in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship of Self-Rated Health with Fatal and Non-Fatal Outcomes in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLoS ONE, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0103509
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nahal Mavaddat, Richard A. Parker, Simon Sanderson, Jonathan Mant, Ann Louise Kinmonth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Unspecified 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Other 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 36%
Unspecified 12 24%
Psychology 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 6 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#9,507,444
of 12,371,096 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#94,042
of 135,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,001
of 266,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#3,722
of 5,402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,371,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.