↓ Skip to main content

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010403.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Kloukos, Piotr Fudalej, Patrick Sequeira-Byron, Christos Katsaros

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 52 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#893,041
of 16,024,082 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,447
of 11,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,713
of 278,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,024,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.