↓ Skip to main content

The influence of Arctic amplification on mid-latitude summer circulation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
515 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of Arctic amplification on mid-latitude summer circulation
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05256-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Coumou, G. Di Capua, S. Vavrus, L. Wang, S. Wang

Abstract

Accelerated warming in the Arctic, as compared to the rest of the globe, might have profound impacts on mid-latitude weather. Most studies analyzing Arctic links to mid-latitude weather focused on winter, yet recent summers have seen strong reductions in sea-ice extent and snow cover, a weakened equator-to-pole thermal gradient and associated weakening of the mid-latitude circulation. We review the scientific evidence behind three leading hypotheses on the influence of Arctic changes on mid-latitude summer weather: Weakened storm tracks, shifted jet streams, and amplified quasi-stationary waves. We show that interactions between Arctic teleconnections and other remote and regional feedback processes could lead to more persistent hot-dry extremes in the mid-latitudes. The exact nature of these non-linear interactions is not well quantified but they provide potential high-impact risks for society.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 515 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 104 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 20%
Student > Master 35 8%
Student > Bachelor 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 84 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 186 44%
Environmental Science 60 14%
Engineering 14 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Physics and Astronomy 13 3%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 107 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 814. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,021
of 21,173,427 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#280
of 41,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283
of 246,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,427 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them