Title |
Augmentation index is associated with coronary revascularization in patients with high Framingham risk scores: a hospital-based observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12872-015-0123-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
JoonHyouk Choi, Song-Yi Kim, Seung-Jae Joo, Ki-Seok Kim |
Abstract |
This study analyzed PWAs in patients with high Framingham risk scores to determine whether PWA is predictive of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment. In total, 310 patients were screened due to suspected CAD; 78 were excluded due to PCI history (32), atrial fibrillation (11), or acute myocardial infarction (35). The augmentation index (AIx) was analyzed immediately before coronary angiography. PCI was performed in 73 (31.5 %) patients. The mean AIx, adjusted by heart rate ([email protected]) was different for each clinical diagnosis in the PCI group (stable angina, 30.6 ± 7.7 %; silent ischemia, 30.2 ± 8.6 %; unstable angina, 38.5 ± 8.5 %; p = 0.026). The 10-year estimate of CVD risk, based on the Framingham heart score, was 25.3 ± 6.5 % and the mean [email protected] was 31.6 ± 8.5 % in the PCI group, significantly higher than in the non-PCI group (18.8 ± 10.2 %, p < 0.001; 27.2 ± 9.0 %, p = 0.006, respectively). An inverse correlation was observed between the minimal luminal area and [email protected] (rho = -0.559, p = 0.010, n = 20). In ROC curve analysis of multivariate logistic regression model, higher HDL, medication of hypertension, and higher body mass index were associated with non-PCI and higher [email protected] was associated with PCI (area under the curve, 0.764; 95 % CI: 0.701 to 0.819, z = 8.005; p <0.001). The [email protected] seemed to reflect the clinical severity of CAD and was associated with PCI in patients with a high Framingham risk score. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 26% |