↓ Skip to main content

#IHMayDay: tweeting for empowerment and social and emotional wellbeing

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Psychiatry, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
#IHMayDay: tweeting for empowerment and social and emotional wellbeing
Published in
Australasian Psychiatry, October 2015
DOI 10.1177/1039856215609762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sweet, Melissa, Geia, Lynore, Dudgeon, Pat, McCallum, Kerry, Melissa Sweet, Lynore Geia, Pat Dudgeon, Kerry McCallum

Abstract

This paper examines the themes of #IHMayDay, a day-long Twitter discussion about Indigenous health led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples on 1 May 2014. The Symplur analytics tool was used to identify the Twitter activity associated with #IHMayDay. This paper reviews the content of 423 tweets that were tweeted and retweeted by 346 individuals and 108 organisations. Issues related to social and emotional wellbeing were dominant, and the analysis highlights the empowering nature of the strengths-based discourse. Twitter-based events such as #IHMayDay and initiatives such as the rotated, curated account @IndigenousX are powerful platforms for learning, exchange, advocacy and dialogue about the social and emotional wellbeing and mental health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Other 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 26%
Social Sciences 7 26%
Arts and Humanities 3 11%
Psychology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Other 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,211,910
of 12,119,647 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Psychiatry
#66
of 968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,705
of 251,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Psychiatry
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,119,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.