| Title |
Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Public Health, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30135-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara B Seidelmann, Brian Claggett, Susan Cheng, Mir Henglin, Amil Shah, Lyn M Steffen, Aaron R Folsom, Eric B Rimm, Walter C Willett, Scott D Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,092 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 754 | 12% |
| United States | 658 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 316 | 5% |
| Spain | 150 | 2% |
| Canada | 126 | 2% |
| Australia | 88 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 70 | 1% |
| India | 54 | <1% |
| Mexico | 52 | <1% |
| Other | 696 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3128 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4988 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 571 | 9% |
| Scientists | 456 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 72 | 1% |
| Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1456 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 209 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 187 | 13% |
| Researcher | 169 | 12% |
| Other | 109 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 7% |
| Other | 265 | 18% |
| Unknown | 412 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 329 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 187 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 55 | 4% |
| Other | 214 | 15% |
| Unknown | 487 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5750. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#620
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Public Health
#2
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5
of 342,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Public Health
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 163.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.