You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can accelerometry be used to distinguish between flight types in soaring birds?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40317-015-0077-0 |
| Authors |
H. J. Williams, E. L. C. Shepard, O. Duriez, S. A. Lambertucci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Canada | 3 | 27% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,850,449
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#116
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,364
of 279,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.