↓ Skip to main content

Turning bubbles on and off during boiling using charged surfactants

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Turning bubbles on and off during boiling using charged surfactants
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms9599
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Jeremy Cho, Jordan P. Mizerak, Evelyn N. Wang

Abstract

Boiling-a process that has powered industries since the steam age-is governed by bubble formation. State-of-the-art boiling surfaces often increase bubble nucleation via roughness and/or wettability modification to increase performance. However, without active in situ control of bubbles, temperature or steam generation cannot be adjusted for a given heat input. Here we report the ability to turn bubbles 'on and off' independent of heat input during boiling both temporally and spatially via molecular manipulation of the boiling surface. As a result, we can rapidly and reversibly alter heat transfer performance up to an order of magnitude. Our experiments show that this active control is achieved by electrostatically adsorbing and desorbing charged surfactants to alter the wettability of the surface, thereby affecting nucleation. This approach can improve performance and flexibility in existing boiling technologies as well as enable emerging or unprecedented energy applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 27%
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Professor 10 5%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 91 47%
Energy 11 6%
Physics and Astronomy 10 5%
Chemical Engineering 9 5%
Materials Science 8 4%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#469,734
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,260
of 47,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,807
of 283,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#172
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.