↓ Skip to main content

Novel method to detect microRNAs using chip-based QuantStudio 3D digital PCR

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel method to detect microRNAs using chip-based QuantStudio 3D digital PCR
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2097-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davide Conte, Carla Verri, Cristina Borzi, Paola Suatoni, Ugo Pastorino, Gabriella Sozzi, Orazio Fortunato

Abstract

Research efforts for the management of cancer, in particular for lung cancer, are directed to identify new strategies for its early detection. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a new promising class of circulating biomarkers for cancer detection, but lack of consensus on data normalization methods has affected the diagnostic potential of circulating miRNAs. There is a growing interest in techniques that allow an absolute quantification of miRNAs which could be useful for early diagnosis. Recently, digital PCR, mainly based on droplets generation, emerged as an affordable technology for precise and absolute quantification of nucleic acids. In this work, we described a new interesting approach for profiling circulating miRNAs in plasma samples using a chip-based platform, the QuantStudio 3D digital PCR. The proposed method was validated using synthethic oligonucleotide at serial dilutions in plasma samples of lung cancer patients and in lung tissues and cell lines. Given its reproducibility and reliability, our approach could be potentially applied for the identification and quantification of miRNAs in other biological samples such as circulating exosomes or protein complexes. As chip-digital PCR becomes more established, it would be a robust tool for quantitative assessment of miRNA copy number for diagnosis of lung cancer and other diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 117 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Engineering 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,775,656
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,568
of 10,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,171
of 283,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#281
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.