↓ Skip to main content

Different feeding strategies on larval rearing of angelfish (Peterolophyllum scalare,Cichlidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Amazonica
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 132)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different feeding strategies on larval rearing of angelfish (Peterolophyllum scalare,Cichlidae)
Published in
Acta Amazonica
DOI 10.1590/1809-4392201500472
Authors

PEREIRA, Samuel Louzada, GONÇALVES JUNIOR, Lucas Pedro, AZEVEDO, Rafael Vieira de, MATIELO, Marcelo Darós, SELVATICI, Paula del Caro, AMORIM, Ismael Rafane, MENDONÇA, Pedro Pierro, PEREIRA, Samuel Louzada, GONÇALVES JUNIOR, Lucas Pedro, AZEVEDO, Rafael Vieira de, MATIELO, Marcelo Darós, SELVATICI, Paula del Caro, AMORIM, Ismael Rafane, MENDONÇA, Pedro Pierro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 29%
Student > Master 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 57%
Engineering 2 14%
Chemistry 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,443,208
of 6,391,435 outputs
Outputs from Acta Amazonica
#35
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,890
of 197,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Amazonica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,391,435 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.