↓ Skip to main content

Turbidite event history—Methods and implications for Holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Turbidite event history—Methods and implications for Holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2012
DOI 10.3133/pp1661f
Authors

Goldfinger, Chris, Nelson, C. Hans, Morey, Ann E., Johnson, Joel E., Patton, Jason R., Karabanov, Eugene B., Gutierrez-Pastor, Julia, Eriksson, Andrew T., Gracia, Eulalia, Dunhill, Gita, Enkin, Randolph J., Dallimore, Audrey, Vallier, Tracy

Editors

Kayen, Robert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 32%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 93 70%
Unspecified 16 12%
Engineering 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#923,044
of 22,230,789 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#55
of 2,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,982
of 301,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#1
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,230,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.