↓ Skip to main content

Alternative positions for the baby at birth before clamping the umbilical cord

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alternative positions for the baby at birth before clamping the umbilical cord
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007555.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca J Palethorpe, Diane Farrar, Lelia Duley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Psychology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,690,603
of 14,436,298 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,580
of 10,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,559
of 285,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#187
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,436,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.