↓ Skip to main content

Lion (Panthera leo) populations are declining rapidly across Africa, except in intensively managed areas

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
69 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
266 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lion (Panthera leo) populations are declining rapidly across Africa, except in intensively managed areas
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1500664112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Bauer, Guillaume Chapron, Kristin Nowell, Philipp Henschel, Paul Funston, Luke T. B. Hunter, David W. Macdonald, Craig Packer

Abstract

We compiled all credible repeated lion surveys and present time series data for 47 lion (Panthera leo) populations. We used a Bayesian state space model to estimate growth rate-λ for each population and summed these into three regional sets to provide conservation-relevant estimates of trends since 1990. We found a striking geographical pattern: African lion populations are declining everywhere, except in four southern countries (Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe). Population models indicate a 67% chance that lions in West and Central Africa decline by one-half, while estimating a 37% chance that lions in East Africa also decline by one-half over two decades. We recommend separate regional assessments of the lion in the World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species: already recognized as critically endangered in West Africa, our analysis supports listing as regionally endangered in Central and East Africa and least concern in southern Africa. Almost all lion populations that historically exceeded ∼500 individuals are declining, but lion conservation is successful in southern Africa, in part because of the proliferation of reintroduced lions in small, fenced, intensively managed, and funded reserves. If management budgets for wild lands cannot keep pace with mounting levels of threat, the species may rely increasingly on these southern African areas and may no longer be a flagship species of the once vast natural ecosystems across the rest of the continent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 266 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 530 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 16%
Student > Master 88 16%
Researcher 87 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 15%
Other 26 5%
Other 68 12%
Unknown 105 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 221 40%
Environmental Science 119 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 2%
Social Sciences 12 2%
Other 42 8%
Unknown 127 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 806. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#23,656
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#717
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223
of 298,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.