↓ Skip to main content

Social Media and the Journal: Entering a New Era

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media and the Journal: Entering a New Era
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.06.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eiran Z. Gorodeski, Michael W. Rich, Paul J. Hauptman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,166,323
of 12,181,658 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#61
of 872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,856
of 247,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,181,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.