↓ Skip to main content

Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001208.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Roberts, Karen Blackhall, Phil Alderson, Frances Bunn, Gillian Schierhout

Abstract

Human albumin solutions are used for a range of medical and surgical problems. Licensed indications are the emergency treatment of shock and other conditions where restoration of blood volume is urgent, such as in burns and hypoproteinaemia. Human albumin solutions are more expensive than other colloids and crystalloids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 328 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 14%
Other 45 13%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Postgraduate 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 98 28%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 210 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 66 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,444,591
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,949
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,683
of 155,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.