↓ Skip to main content

Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001208.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Roberts, Karen Blackhall, Phil Alderson, Frances Bunn, Gillian Schierhout

Abstract

Human albumin solutions are used for a range of medical and surgical problems. Licensed indications are the emergency treatment of shock and other conditions where restoration of blood volume is urgent, such as in burns and hypoproteinaemia. Human albumin solutions are more expensive than other colloids and crystalloids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 224 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 16%
Other 37 15%
Student > Postgraduate 32 13%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 77 31%
Unknown 9 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 177 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 18 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,757,475
of 14,083,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,492
of 10,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,673
of 206,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#211
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.