↓ Skip to main content

Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001208.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Roberts, Karen Blackhall, Phil Alderson, Frances Bunn, Gillian Schierhout

Abstract

Human albumin solutions are used for a range of medical and surgical problems. Licensed indications are the emergency treatment of shock and other conditions where restoration of blood volume is urgent, such as in burns and hypoproteinaemia. Human albumin solutions are more expensive than other colloids and crystalloids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 265 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 15%
Other 40 14%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Postgraduate 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 89 31%
Unknown 19 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 193 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 31 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,618,709
of 17,155,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,065
of 11,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,866
of 219,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,155,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.