Title |
Egg laying sequence influences egg mercury concentrations and egg size in three bird species: Implications for contaminant monitoring programs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/etc.3291 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ackerman, Joshua T., Eagles‐Smith, Collin A., Herzog, Mark P., Yee, Julie L., Hartman, C. Alex, Ackerman, Joshua T, Eagles-Smith, Collin A, Herzog, Mark P, Yee, Julie L, Hartman, C Alex |
Abstract |
Bird eggs are commonly used in contaminant monitoring programs and toxicological risk assessments, but intra-clutch variation and sampling methodology could influence interpretability. We examined the influence of egg laying sequence on egg mercury concentrations and burdens in American avocets, black-necked stilts, and Forster's terns. The average decline in mercury concentrations between the first and last egg laid was 33% for stilts, 22% for terns, and 11% for avocets, and most of this decline occurred between the first and second eggs laid (24% for stilts, 18% for terns, and 9% for avocets). Trends in egg size with egg laying order were inconsistent among species and overall differences in egg volume, mass, length, and width were <3%. We summarized the literature and, among 17 species studied, mercury concentrations generally declined by 16% between the first and second eggs laid. Despite the strong effect of egg laying sequence, most of the variance in egg mercury concentrations still occurred among clutches (75%-91%) rather than within clutches (9%-25%). Using simulations, we determined that to accurately estimate a population's mean egg mercury concentration using only a single random egg from a subset of nests, it would require sampling >60 nests to represent a large population (10% accuracy) or ≥14 nests to represent a small colony that contained <100 nests (20% accuracy). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
Faroe Islands | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 29% |
Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 24% |
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |