↓ Skip to main content

Rhinitis and pregnancy: literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 474)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhinitis and pregnancy: literature review
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.04.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Azevedo Caparroz, Luciano Lobato Gregorio, Giuliano Bongiovanni, Suemy Cioffi Izu, Eduardo Macoto Kosugi

Abstract

There is a controversy concerning the terminology and definition of rhinitis in pregnancy. Gestational rhinitis is a relatively common condition, which has drawn increasing interest in recent years due to a possible association with maternal obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and unfavorable fetal outcomes. To review the current knowledge on gestacional rhinitis, and to assess its evidence. Structured literature search. Gestational rhinitis and rhinitis "during pregnancy" are somewhat similar conditions regarding their physiopathology and treatment, but differ regarding definition and prognosis. Hormonal changes have a presumed etiological role, but knowledge about the physiopathology of gestational rhinitis is still lacking. Management of rhinitis during pregnancy focuses on the minimal intervention required for symptom relief. As it has a great impact on maternal quality of life, both the otorhinolaryngologist and the obstetrician must be careful concerning the early diagnosis and treatment of gestational rhinitis, considering the safety of treatment measures and drugs and their current level of evidence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 22%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,377,791
of 18,908,606 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#15
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,968
of 296,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,908,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them