@CristinaDragani "Our results show that the safest level of drinking is none" https://t.co/ZwSFcSg62I
@ScaltritiLab ricordo molto bene quando uscì questo articolo https://t.co/pq5Agro92q
@alice_ledda_ @pimpi59 C'è questa revisione sistematica postata da @EttoBortolini che penso possa servirti da summary https://t.co/ov5ttyZ8QI
@GiadaGiorgi23 https://t.co/N7DZpUNXq3 Ripeto: un calice di vino non ha mai fatto male a nessuno è falso.è una frase fatta degli anni 80 senza alcuna base Scientifica. Inoltre, su una bottiglia alcolica puoi applicare etichette e decidere di non berlo, su
https://t.co/N7DZpUNpAv Ovviamente posto articolo peer review di Lancet che ha fatto su argomento, lo studio più approfondito mai fatto sul tema, dimostrando che Alcol fa SEMPRE male in qualsiasi quantità.
@mrocchifilms https://t.co/N7DZpUNpAv Questo l'articolo pubblicato su Lancet, la rivista scientifica + autorevole al mondo. È peer reviewed Ovviamente e la conclusione è appunto questa : alcol fa male a QUALSIASI dose. 👏
@italy983 @elleuca_ @Bordnassela Ripetiamolo assieme https://t.co/8djMzWzrT7
@Nessuno26373293 @m_emozioni @ultimora_pol È poco più che una credenza popolare, ed in letteratura c’è un consenso abbastanza diffuso sul fatto che sia erronea e fuorviante. Cito questo lavoro pubblicato su Lancet ma ce ne sono molti altri altrettando val
@TheLancet è la rivista medica accademica Peer reviewed più importante al mondo. Ha condotto lo studio più grande e approfondito esistente sull'alcol ed ha concluso che sempre, SEMPRE, fa male. Anche un solo bicchiere di vino. Io credo alla scienza. https
RT @InstAlcStud: @pash22 @McGivernC_ @amirharjo @ProfByron @WHO @1987Andrewk @linzasaur The video shared by @ScottM2018 is a great explanat…
Vedo che anche per il vino ci si spende molto! Ricordo che NON ESISTE DOSE SICURA DI ALCOL, meno se ne beve meglio è. Esiste un range di consumo "a basso rischio", ma nel complesso la cancerogenicità porta sempre ad avere un RR>1 https://t.co/Aj1IiOiJ1
@pash22 @McGivernC_ @amirharjo @ProfByron @WHO @1987Andrewk @linzasaur The video shared by @ScottM2018 is a great explanation of why previous studies have not been good quality. Also: 1: Why poor quality research has led to incorrect findings of cardiopro
L’alcool est dangereux, même à faible dose, c’est plus à prouver, mais si vous en doutiez encore : https://t.co/ZNKFqZLAt4
@nathan_k i agree with you. though your given example also constitutes a misleading comparison. the big meta analysis that comes to mind in association with "no safe dose of booze" is: https://t.co/aHgXSKuUOZ i wish the data existed for entheogen use to
@2Norteboca そうなんです。アルコールに関しては悲しきかな、適量がないんです😥 2018年のLancetの文献添付しますね https://t.co/Ipxz0eu1tk
Actually, there is no “healthy” level of drinking. “The level of [alcohol] consumption that minimizes health loss is zero.” https://t.co/Ia1v7s5TEw
@SandyKeysCorp @Brahmslover1278 The largest study on this topic concluded that the healthiest quantity of alcohol to consume is zero. If you are addicted to the feeling and are willing to make a small sacrifice with your health to feel it, that's one thin
@Art0fLife_ I am a follower of you. Will you give me a follow? Here is my first thread. https://t.co/snFQhKDebk
@elonmusk @WholeMarsBlog Science behind drinking and health. https://t.co/snFQhKDM0S
@TheJackBly Yes. It is backed up by science but nothing to worry about if you are a light/social drinker. https://t.co/snFQhKDebk
I will introduce overlooked science and medical research related to health in the new year. My first topic is alcohol use and health. I will link to the original research article and follow with my comments. Give me a follow if this is interesting to you.
権威ある雑誌の論文のここ→The level of alcohol consumption that minimised harm across health outcomes was zero (95% UI 0·0–0·8) standard drinks per week. https://t.co/FyhIlGfLjG
"The level of alcohol consumption that minimized harm across health outcomes was zero standard drinks per week” https://t.co/izLwzdUBx9
2 studi interessanti sull'origine di SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/SEDA36aLhD https://t.co/xClJtj5opl alcol, danni alla salute: https://t.co/uncPe1UjTS latte e la storia degli studi sui benefici/rischi associati: https://t.co/YCLFzZAVfl danni carne (rossa): htt
RT @jeanralpht: Ce thread a majoritairement pour cible le grand public. Les professionnels de santé ou d’autres personnes qui veulent avoir…
Ce thread a majoritairement pour cible le grand public. Les professionnels de santé ou d’autres personnes qui veulent avoir plus d’informations, voici les liens des documents utilisés : https://t.co/1uA6EpQfZQ https://t.co/NtkH7SJT5e https://t.co/1OEGxS
@ryantakesoff Some research. https://t.co/dXbZjHiLKq
@Ferrnanda La interpretación en este estudio es que el nivel de consumo de alcohol que minimiza riesgos es Cero: https://t.co/kgSKj1Up2i
UK deaths specifically due to alcohol consumption have risen for the third year in a row; a reminder that the most comprehensive study of alcohol to date found that "[t]he level of alcohol consumption that minimised harm across health outcomes was zero". h
@Edmondfernandes 👋 Hi Edmond, we no longer use the term/label alcoholics similar to “diabetics” or “schizophrenics” Instead Person/s with alcohol use/disorder About the level of consumption ➡️ “the level of consumption that minimises health loss is ze
RT @espitagorgorita: @punky_morrigan No hay ninguna cantidad de alcohol segura. Esta revisión sistemática (el nivel más alto de evidencia c…
@punky_morrigan No hay ninguna cantidad de alcohol segura. Esta revisión sistemática (el nivel más alto de evidencia científica) ya lo dejó claro en 2017. Lo mejor, no beber. https://t.co/DdNvXIB4FX
@Kaliop12 @AnthonyScelsi pour l'alcool c'est dès la première prise (ce qui n'est PAS d'après moi une raison de l'interdire) https://t.co/2TMSpkCgSz https://t.co/GWAEpmdNgr
@Viriath @Acermendax Ah oui de la fameuse revue scientifique très sérieuse https://t.co/16BiPnEUyg. Le bon niveau d'alcool par jour pour la santé c'est : 0 https://t.co/fZKekfv5pe
@ledauphine ❌#Intox https://t.co/S52eRBuT8n
@JamesGierach @EMCDDA @MatthewNiceUN Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 https://t.co/M7QGIv2Drf https://t.co/s9xW8y9XK6
"The risk of all-cause mortality, and of cancers specifically, rises with increasing levels of consumption, and the level of consumption that minimises health loss is zero," --The Lancet https://t.co/uL0tkCLz5i
@juliasskr @mart_mio @dw_russian Исследования известного журнала "Ланцет" при поддержке Вашингтонского университета. Самые пьющие мужчины в мире - румыны, самые пьющие женщины в мире- украинки. Пруф ))) https://t.co/dixrQtoPhq
@markhenick @CaulfieldTim @NCICancerStats @statnews @theNCI @cancersociety @UAlbertaSPH @OttawaHealth @CIHR_ICR There is this evidence pre-pandemic that looks at ETOH use and mortality (including cancer) https://t.co/FSjOeLCh79
@ffautrad @ShelbyTommy_07 @Nicochoco6 @Prymant @MichelNicolasA1 Non c’est des le premier verre. Ça peut être difficile à un certain âge de s’en rendre compte je le conçois, d’autant plus que pendant 50 ans les gouvernements ont matraqué tout l’inverse pour
@BabcockChrisM @dickievirgin @showmetheyamz I'm certain that they're referring to this. https://t.co/Oz9LrnRQn8 Global study, 1900 to 2016
@jsenior64 Piénselo antes, doctor, y reduzca daños: «Our results show that the safest level of drinking is none» https://t.co/HSo3JUGkpr
@DLFederico98 per completezza, sull'alcol: https://t.co/JS42Cpqzjy
@medmyths @CCSACanada I find this new study ??? - I remember this study from a few years ago and for a man in a wealthy country, removing risk of death from tuberculosis, the excess death risk did not really budge until about 8 drinks per day. https://t.co
Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet https://t.co/vKlsc2Q0RZ
Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 - The Lancet https://t.co/vKlsc2Q0RZ
FALSO FALSO FALSO. NON ESISTE DOSE SICURA DI ALCOL. meno se ne beve meglio è. esiste un range di consumo "a basso rischio", ma nel complesso comunque la cancerogenicità cancella i piccoli benefici che un consumo molto moderato può portare per altri aspetti
@sarsora404 حتى المقالات دي بترجع تستَطرد وتقول إن لو التزمت بأكل صحّي متوازن هتقلل احتمالية اصابتك بالأمراض دي أكتر بكتير من التقليل اللي هييجي نتيجة شرب الكحول. ممكن تشوفي: • البحث: https://t.co/tNAuRJUQoe • مقالة بتناقش البحث: https://t.co/h0Je5ms3X
Instead of finding new efficace treatments, present knowledge still relies on older forms of treatments that will destroy cancer cells,while causing minimal damage to normal cells and ability to invade and metastasize.
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19…
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19…
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19…
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19…
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19…
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19…
RT @JulioBasulto_DN: Esta analogía la aprendí del gran @drmiguelmarcos (¡no dejéis de seguirle!). Ah, y aquí el estudio, que constató que e…
@dyctiostelium No se que esten argumentando ellos, pero ahora he visto que mucha gente esta discutiendo esto: https://t.co/23kvTuAPyZ https://t.co/hQ5WvYX77R
@TheGlenlivet Oh great to know hypertension, liver cirrhosis, gastrointestinal cancers, loss of memory/cognitive impairment, obesity, etc etc are not just for white middle class males. "Drink responsibly" you say? Only responsible quantity is zero: https:
@AndreaMarango20 mi sembra strano link? https://t.co/Aj1IiOiJ1f https://t.co/99eFSYRief
RT @orpelas: 「名医が教える飲酒の科学 」 ・酒の強さはアセトアルデヒドの分解能力 ・アセトアルデヒドは有害で酢酸は無害 ・適量とはビール中瓶1本、日本酒1合、ワイン2〜3杯。 ・身体に害になるのは上記の3倍 2018年のLancet論文によると酒量ゼロが一番健…
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは?…
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは?…
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは?…
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは?…
RT @orpelas: 「名医が教える飲酒の科学 」 ・酒の強さはアセトアルデヒドの分解能力 ・アセトアルデヒドは有害で酢酸は無害 ・適量とはビール中瓶1本、日本酒1合、ワイン2〜3杯。 ・身体に害になるのは上記の3倍 2018年のLancet論文によると酒量ゼロが一番健…
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは?…
RT @ShigekiKanamori: 解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは?…
解毒の邪魔 AGE蓄積で老化の原因 補酵素浪費 などの理由で数年前に酒はやめました 断酒に何度も失敗してる人は ATP欠乏で飲酒欲求があること 解毒でビタミンが浪費されること niacin補充で飲酒欲求がなくなること を学んでは? 勉強が足りないのであって 意志が足りない訳ではないです
RT @orpelas: 「名医が教える飲酒の科学 」 ・酒の強さはアセトアルデヒドの分解能力 ・アセトアルデヒドは有害で酢酸は無害 ・適量とはビール中瓶1本、日本酒1合、ワイン2〜3杯。 ・身体に害になるのは上記の3倍 2018年のLancet論文によると酒量ゼロが一番健…
「名医が教える飲酒の科学 」 ・酒の強さはアセトアルデヒドの分解能力 ・アセトアルデヒドは有害で酢酸は無害 ・適量とはビール中瓶1本、日本酒1合、ワイン2〜3杯。 ・身体に害になるのは上記の3倍 2018年のLancet論文によると酒量ゼロが一番健康にいいみたいですね😂 https://t.co/E5JZsE9aLk https://t.co/ZRebw7dPbY
In #Deutschland starben 2016 an ausschließlich auf #Alkohol (z.B. Bayerisches #Bier) zurückzuführenden Todesursachen 19.000 Frauen & 43.000 Männer Das waren 4,0 % aller Todesfälle unter Frauen https://t.co/IGL35mwbIh & 9,9 % aller Todesfälle unte
RT @uhcensored: @erkekadamblogu En iyi alkol tuketim senaryosu hiç alkol tüketmemek. https://t.co/PQEZ6Dmho0
@Talbenmoshe1 יש מחקר קודם שבדק איזו כמות של אלכוהול היא בטוחה. התשובה היא - אפס. אלכוהול הוא רעל בכל כמות. מעלה תחלואה ותמותה. מחקר אחר הראה שכל כמות אלכוהול פוגעת במח. גוף האדם צריך פחממות, חלבונים,שומנים,מינרלים וויטמינים. הוא לא צריך אלכוהול בכל רמה.
RT @uhcensored: @erkekadamblogu En iyi alkol tuketim senaryosu hiç alkol tüketmemek. https://t.co/PQEZ6Dmho0
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: #Holetschek Weltweit lassen sich 2,2 % aller Todesfälle bei Frauen & 6,8 % bei Männern auf den Alkoholkonsum zurückführ…
RT @uhcensored: @erkekadamblogu En iyi alkol tuketim senaryosu hiç alkol tüketmemek. https://t.co/PQEZ6Dmho0
Druk(Another Round)
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: #Holetschek Weltweit lassen sich 2,2 % aller Todesfälle bei Frauen & 6,8 % bei Männern auf den Alkoholkonsum zurückführ…
RT @Cannabis_Lobby: #Holetschek Weltweit lassen sich 2,2 % aller Todesfälle bei Frauen & 6,8 % bei Männern auf den Alkoholkonsum zurückführ…
#Holetschek Weltweit lassen sich 2,2 % aller Todesfälle bei Frauen & 6,8 % bei Männern auf den Alkoholkonsum zurückführen. In der Altersgruppe der "U-50"-Jährigen liegt der Anteil https://t.co/KN9wSAIls2 bei 3,8 % (Frauen) & 12,2 % (Männer). L
RT @uhcensored: @erkekadamblogu En iyi alkol tuketim senaryosu hiç alkol tüketmemek. https://t.co/PQEZ6Dmho0
RT @uhcensored: @erkekadamblogu En iyi alkol tuketim senaryosu hiç alkol tüketmemek. https://t.co/PQEZ6Dmho0
@MujeebR95195794 @AldasZarnauskas @hubermanlab Except it's not up to date with the current knowledge. https://t.co/E9WSYu1B9U https://t.co/Y0UwpaEJOV
@TheGunted @Anon_Brah @MujeebR95195794 @AldasZarnauskas @hubermanlab This is from a meta analysis of about 600 studies. https://t.co/QqCfS0PRFP https://t.co/8cUznesA0F
RT @Momiji_Aphorism: @syamo0001 @wildwilly888 最近否定されちゃったんですよね(´・ω・`) https://t.co/Zlg2YmZqbW https://t.co/LQgyfUFLFP
RT @Momiji_Aphorism: @syamo0001 @wildwilly888 最近否定されちゃったんですよね(´・ω・`) https://t.co/Zlg2YmZqbW https://t.co/LQgyfUFLFP
RT @Momiji_Aphorism: @syamo0001 @wildwilly888 最近否定されちゃったんですよね(´・ω・`) https://t.co/Zlg2YmZqbW https://t.co/LQgyfUFLFP
RT @Momiji_Aphorism: @syamo0001 @wildwilly888 最近否定されちゃったんですよね(´・ω・`) https://t.co/Zlg2YmZqbW https://t.co/LQgyfUFLFP