↓ Skip to main content

Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3742 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3507 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis
Published in
Nature, October 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature15756
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayuko Hoshino, Bruno Costa-Silva, Tang-Long Shen, Goncalo Rodrigues, Ayako Hashimoto, Milica Tesic Mark, Henrik Molina, Shinji Kohsaka, Angela Di Giannatale, Sophia Ceder, Swarnima Singh, Caitlin Williams, Nadine Soplop, Kunihiro Uryu, Lindsay Pharmer, Tari King, Linda Bojmar, Alexander E. Davies, Yonathan Ararso, Tuo Zhang, Haiying Zhang, Jonathan Hernandez, Joshua M. Weiss, Vanessa D. Dumont-Cole, Kimberly Kramer, Leonard H. Wexler, Aru Narendran, Gary K. Schwartz, John H. Healey, Per Sandstrom, Knut Jørgen Labori, Elin H. Kure, Paul M. Grandgenett, Michael A. Hollingsworth, Maria de Sousa, Sukhwinder Kaur, Maneesh Jain, Kavita Mallya, Surinder K. Batra, William R. Jarnagin, Mary S. Brady, Oystein Fodstad, Volkmar Muller, Klaus Pantel, Andy J. Minn, Mina J. Bissell, Benjamin A. Garcia, Yibin Kang, Vinagolu K. Rajasekhar, Cyrus M. Ghajar, Irina Matei, Hector Peinado, Jacqueline Bromberg, David Lyden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Netherlands 5 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Other 18 <1%
Unknown 3434 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 757 22%
Researcher 578 16%
Student > Bachelor 378 11%
Student > Master 359 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 186 5%
Other 498 14%
Unknown 751 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 929 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 586 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 480 14%
Engineering 116 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 110 3%
Other 401 11%
Unknown 885 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 285. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#127,642
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,368
of 99,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,634
of 296,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#191
of 1,153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.