↓ Skip to main content

Core Outcome Set for GROwth restriction: deVeloping Endpoints (COSGROVE)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Core Outcome Set for GROwth restriction: deVeloping Endpoints (COSGROVE)
Published in
Trials, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2819-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Healy, Sanne Gordijn, Wessel Ganzevoort, Irene Beune, Ahmet Baschat, Asma Khalil, Louise Kenny, Frank Bloomfield, Mandy Daly, Aris Papageorghiou, Declan Devane

Abstract

Foetal growth restriction (FGR) refers to a foetus that does not reach its genetically predetermined growth potential. It is well recognised that growth-restricted foetuses are at increased risk of stillbirth, foetal compromise, early neonatal death and neonatal morbidity. Later in life, they are prone to health problems, including increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders. Interventions for preventing and treating FGR have been studied in many trials, but evidence is often difficult to synthesise and compare because of differences in the selection and definition of outcomes. To enable future trials to measure similar, meaningful outcomes, we are developing two core outcome sets (COS) - one for prevention and the other for treatment of FGR. We will review the literature to identify previously reported outcomes. An international panel of relevant stakeholders who have experience of FGR (parent or carer of a baby that was growth restricted, health professional involved in the care of mothers and babies affected by FGR, a person with expertise in FGR research) will rate the importance of each of those outcomes in a series of three sequential online rounds of a Delphi study. Participants will be able to add items to the proposed list in round 1. A final face-to-face consensus meeting will be held with representatives of each stakeholder group at which a final list of outcomes for inclusion in the COS will be agreed. The development of COSs in FGR will ensure the collection and reporting of a minimum dataset agreed by stakeholder consensus and will reduce inconsistencies in the reporting of outcomes across relevant trials. Such standardisation in the reporting of outcomes will improve synthesis of evidence and generalisability of knowledge in the future by reducing heterogeneity in outcomes between trials and thus improve the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Ultimately, we hope that the COSs will lead to an improvement in the quality of evidence-based clinical practice, enhance patient care, and improve the quality and consistency of research. Not applicable. This study is registered in the Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness (COMET) database.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 45 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 49 43%