↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating processes of care and outcomes of children in hospital (EPOCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating processes of care and outcomes of children in hospital (EPOCH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0712-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher S. Parshuram, Karen Dryden-Palmer, Catherine Farrell, Ronald Gottesman, Martin Gray, James S. Hutchison, Mark Helfaer, Elizabeth Hunt, Ari Joffe, Jacques Lacroix, Vinay Nadkarni, Patricia Parkin, David Wensley, Andrew R Willan, For the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

Abstract

The prevention of near and actual cardiopulmonary arrest in hospitalized children is a patient safety imperative. Prevention is contingent upon the timely identification, referral and treatment of children who are deteriorating clinically. We designed and validated a documentation-based system of care to permit identification and referral as well as facilitate provision of timely treatment. We called it the Bedside Pediatric Early Warning System (BedsidePEWS). Here we describe the rationale for the design, intervention and outcomes of the study entitled Evaluating Processes and Outcomes of Children in Hospital (EPOCH). EPOCH is a cluster-randomized trial of the BedsidePEWS. The unit of randomization is the participating hospital. Eligible hospitals have a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), are anticipated to have organizational stability throughout the study, are not using a severity of illness score in hospital wards and are willing to be randomized. Patients are >37 weeks gestational age and <18 years and are hospitalized in inpatient ward areas during all or part of their hospital admission. Randomization is to either BedsidePEWS or control (no severity of illness score) in a 1:1 ratio within two strata (<200, ≥200 hospital beds). All-cause hospital mortality is the selected primary outcome. It is objective, independent of do-not-resuscitate status and can be reliably measured. The secondary outcomes include (1) clinical outcomes: clinical deterioration, severity of illness at and during ICU admission, and potentially preventable cardiac arrest; (2) processes of care outcomes: immediate calls for assistance, hospital and ICU readmission, and perceptions of healthcare professionals; and (3) resource utilization: ICU days and use of ICU therapies. Following funding by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and local ethical approvals, site enrollment started in 2010 and was closed in February 2014. Patient enrollment is anticipated to be complete in July 2015. The results of EPOCH will strengthen the scientific basis for local, regional, provincial and national decision-making and for the recommendations of national and international bodies. If negative, the costs of hospital-wide implementation can be avoided. If positive, EPOCH will have provided a scientific justification for the major system-level changes required for implementation. NCT01260831 ClinicalTrials.gov date: 14 December 2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 46 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 20%
Engineering 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 53 29%