↓ Skip to main content

Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinichi Nakagawa, Timothy H. Parker

Abstract

We believe that replicating studies in ecology and evolution is extremely valuable, but replication within species and systems is troublingly rare, and even 'quasi-replications' in different systems are often insufficient. We make a case for supporting multiple types of replications and point out that the current incentive structure needs to change if ecologists and evolutionary biologist are to value scientific replication sufficiently.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 133 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 20%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 42%
Environmental Science 27 19%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 29 20%