↓ Skip to main content

Influence of microbiome species in hard-to-heal wounds on disease severity and treatment duration

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of microbiome species in hard-to-heal wounds on disease severity and treatment duration
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.08.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dagmar Chudobova, Kristyna Cihalova, Roman Guran, Simona Dostalova, Kristyna Smerkova, Radek Vesely, Jaromir Gumulec, Michal Masarik, Zbynek Heger, Vojtech Adam, Rene Kizek

Abstract

Infections, mostly those associated with colonization of wound by different pathogenic microorganisms, are one of the most serious health complications during a medical treatment. Therefore, this study is focused on the isolation, characterization, and identification of microorganisms prevalent in superficial wounds of patients (n=50) presenting with bacterial infection. After successful cultivation, bacteria were processed and analyzed. Initially the identification of the strains was performed through matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry based on comparison of protein profiles (2-30kDa) with database. Subsequently, bacterial strains from infected wounds were identified by both matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene 108. The most prevalent species was Staphylococcus aureus (70%), and out of those 11% turned out to be methicillin-resistant (mecA positive). Identified strains were compared with patients' diagnoses using the method of artificial neuronal network to assess the association between severity of infection and wound microbiome species composition. Artificial neuronal network was subsequently used to predict patients' prognosis (n=9) with 85% success. In all of 50 patients tested bacterial infections were identified. Based on the proposed artificial neuronal network we were able to predict the severity of the infection and length of the treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#139
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,071
of 295,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.