↓ Skip to main content

Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012464.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

George U Eleje, Ahizechukwu C Eke, Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu, Joseph I Ikechebelu, Emmanuel O Ugwu, Onyinye O Okonkwo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 409 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 11%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Researcher 39 10%
Other 29 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 7%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 148 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 165 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#16,108,994
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,542
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,573
of 342,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.