↓ Skip to main content

HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
190 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
304 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Kerpedjiev, Nezar Abdennur, Fritz Lekschas, Chuck McCallum, Kasper Dinkla, Hendrik Strobelt, Jacob M. Luber, Scott B. Ouellette, Alaleh Azhir, Nikhil Kumar, Jeewon Hwang, Soohyun Lee, Burak H. Alver, Hanspeter Pfister, Leonid A. Mirny, Peter J. Park, Nils Gehlenborg

Abstract

We present HiGlass, an open source visualization tool built on web technologies that provides a rich interface for rapid, multiplex, and multiscale navigation of 2D genomic maps alongside 1D genomic tracks, allowing users to combine various data types, synchronize multiple visualization modalities, and share fully customizable views with others. We demonstrate its utility in exploring different experimental conditions, comparing the results of analyses, and creating interactive snapshots to share with collaborators and the broader public. HiGlass is accessible online at http://higlass.io and is also available as a containerized application that can be run on any platform.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 190 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 24%
Researcher 47 22%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Professor 15 7%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 18%
Computer Science 15 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 42 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#264,182
of 20,765,300 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#149
of 3,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,671
of 295,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,765,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them