↓ Skip to main content

163 ベビーマッサージで使用したアーモンドオイルによる経皮感作の1例(食物アレルギー7,第58回日本アレルギー学会秋季学術大会)

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 214)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
163 ベビーマッサージで使用したアーモンドオイルによる経皮感作の1例(食物アレルギー7,第58回日本アレルギー学会秋季学術大会)
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.57.1487_3

吉田 晃, 阿部 純也

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
of 12,698,767 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 271,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,698,767 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them