↓ Skip to main content

Effects of combining robot-assisted therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor impairment, motor and daily function, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke: a double-blinde…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of combining robot-assisted therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor impairment, motor and daily function, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12984-015-0088-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-yun Lee, Keh-chung Lin, Hsiao-ju Cheng, Ching-yi Wu, Yu-wei Hsieh, Chih-kuang Chen

Abstract

Robot-assisted therapy (RT) is a widely used intervention approach to enhance motor recovery in patients after stroke, but its effects on functional improvement remained uncertain. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is one potential adjuvant intervention approach to RT that could directly activate the stimulated muscles and improve functional use of the paretic hand. This was a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Thirty-nine individuals with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to the RT combined with NMES (RT + ES) or to RT with sham stimulation (RT + Sham) groups. The participants completed the intervention 90 to 100 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The outcome measures included the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS). All outcome measures were assessed before and after intervention, and the UE-FMA, MAL, and SIS were reassessed at 3 months of follow-up. Compared with the RT + Sham group, the RT + ES group demonstrated greater improvements in wrist flexor MAS score, WMFT quality of movement, and the hand function domain of the SIS. For other outcome measures, both groups improved significantly after the interventions, but no group differences were found. RT + ES induced significant benefits in reducing wrist flexor spasticity and in hand movement quality in patients with chronic stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01655446.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 315 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 16%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 100 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 62 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 15%
Neuroscience 23 7%
Engineering 22 7%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 116 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,468,426
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#496
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,216
of 284,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.