↓ Skip to main content

日本語教育における反転授業実践

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 274)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本語教育における反転授業実践
Published in
Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, August 2018
DOI 10.20721/nihongokyoiku.164.0_126
Authors

古川 智樹, 手塚 まゆ子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,029,857
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#17
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,868
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them