You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scalable Memdiodes Exhibiting Rectification and Hysteresis for Neuromorphic Computing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-30727-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua C. Shank, M. Brooks Tellekamp, Matthew J. Wahila, Sebastian Howard, Alex S. Weidenbach, Bill Zivasatienraj, Louis F. J. Piper, W. Alan Doolittle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 4 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#752,323
of 24,262,436 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#8,144
of 131,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,793
of 338,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#223
of 3,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,262,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.