You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In the belly of the beast: resolving stomach tag data to link temperature, acceleration and feeding in white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Biotelemetry, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40317-015-0071-6 |
Authors |
Salvador J. Jorgensen, Adrian C. Gleiss, Paul E. Kanive, Taylor K. Chapple, Scot D. Anderson, Juan M. Ezcurra, W. Tyler Brandt, Barbara A. Block |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 45% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Bahamas | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
Researcher | 19 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 49% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 12% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#2,631,866
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#62
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,332
of 292,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.