↓ Skip to main content

Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010791.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Redmond, Tamasine C Grimes, Ronan McDonnell, Fiona Boland, Carmel Hughes, Tom Fahey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 13%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 37 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#748,995
of 15,441,426 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,111
of 11,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,316
of 276,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,441,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.